update 4.3

2024-10-19 01:12:52 +07:00 · 2017-12-12 14:59:40 +08:00 · 2017-12-12 14:59:40 +08:00 · 15d4252ec2
commit 15d4252ec2
parent 1c42f754e2
1 changed files with 80 additions and 0 deletions
--- a/doc/4.3_gcc_arg.md
+++ b/doc/4.3_gcc_arg.md
@ -1,6 +1,11 @@
 # 4.3 GCC 编译参数解析

+- [常用选择](#常用选项)
+- [Address sanitizer](#address-sanitizer)
+- [参考资料](#参考资料)

+
+## 常用选项
 #### 控制标准版本的编译选项
 - `-ansi`：告诉编译器遵守 C 语言的 ISO C90 标准。
 - `-std=`：通过使用一个参数来设置需要的标准。
@ -22,3 +27,78 @@
 - `Wswitch-default`：检查是否所有的 switch 语句都包含一个 default case。
 - `Wunused`：检查诸如声明静态函数但没有定义、未使用的参数和丢弃返回结果等情况。
 - `Wall`：启用绝大多数 gcc 的警告选项，包括所有以 -W 为前缀的选项。
+
+
+## Address sanitizer
+Address sanitizer 是一种用于检测内存错误的技术，GCC 从 4.8 版本开始支持了这一技术。ASan 在编译时插入额外指令到内存访问操作中，同时通过 Shadow memory 来记录和检测内存的有效性。ASan 其实只是 Sanitizer 一系列工具中的一员，其他工具比如 memory leak 检测在 LeakSanitizer 中，uninitialized memory read 检测在 MemorySanitizer 中等等。
+
+举个例子，很明显下面这个程序存在栈溢出：
+```C
+#include<stdio.h>
+void main() {
+    int a[10] = {0};
+    int b = a[11];
+}
+```
+编译时加上参数 `-fsanitize=address`，如果使用 Makefile，则将参数加入到 CFLAGS 中：
+```
+$ gcc -fsanitize=address santest.c
+```
+然后运行：
+```
+$ ./a.out 
+=================================================================
+==9399==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow on address 0x7ffc03f4d64c at pc 0x565515082ad6 bp 0x7ffc03f4d5e0 sp 0x7ffc03f4d5d0
+READ of size 4 at 0x7ffc03f4d64c thread T0
+    #0 0x565515082ad5 in main (/home/firmy/a.out+0xad5)
+    #1 0x7fb4c04c0f69 in __libc_start_main (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x20f69)
+    #2 0x565515082899 in _start (/home/firmy/a.out+0x899)
+
+Address 0x7ffc03f4d64c is located in stack of thread T0 at offset 76 in frame
+    #0 0x565515082989 in main (/home/firmy/a.out+0x989)
+
+  This frame has 1 object(s):
+    [32, 72) 'a' <== Memory access at offset 76 overflows this variable
+HINT: this may be a false positive if your program uses some custom stack unwind mechanism or swapcontext
+      (longjmp and C++ exceptions *are* supported)
+SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow (/home/firmy/a.out+0xad5) in main
+Shadow bytes around the buggy address:
+  0x1000007e1a70: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
+  0x1000007e1a80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
+  0x1000007e1a90: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
+  0x1000007e1aa0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
+  0x1000007e1ab0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
+=>0x1000007e1ac0: f1 f1 f1 f1 00 00 00 00 00[f2]f2 f2 00 00 00 00
+  0x1000007e1ad0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
+  0x1000007e1ae0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
+  0x1000007e1af0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
+  0x1000007e1b00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
+  0x1000007e1b10: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
+Shadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes):
+  Addressable:           00
+  Partially addressable: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 
+  Heap left redzone:       fa
+  Freed heap region:       fd
+  Stack left redzone:      f1
+  Stack mid redzone:       f2
+  Stack right redzone:     f3
+  Stack after return:      f5
+  Stack use after scope:   f8
+  Global redzone:          f9
+  Global init order:       f6
+  Poisoned by user:        f7
+  Container overflow:      fc
+  Array cookie:            ac
+  Intra object redzone:    bb
+  ASan internal:           fe
+  Left alloca redzone:     ca
+  Right alloca redzone:    cb
+==9399==ABORTING
+```
+确实检测出了问题。在实战篇中，为了更好地分析软件漏洞，我们可能会经常用到这个选项。
+
+参考：https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AddressSanitizer
+
+
+## 参考资料
+- [GCC online documentation](https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/)